I attended a luncheon not too long ago where Shel Holtz was the guest speaker. During his presentation on Social Media he asked how we defined brand. After several very predictable definitions from the audience he shared his definition with us: “The definition of your brand is whatever Google says it is.” He then went on to explain that if you want to know what people think of your brand type it into Google and see what it returns. Not only how you rank but also what is being said.

As I’ve reflected on this I’ve come to agree with Shel. Furthermore, you not only need to be in touch but you should also be adding to what is being said about your brand at this level. You can’t control what is being said, especially within the various social medias but you can at least be aware of it, and whenever appropriate join the conversation.

Not too long ago I spoke with one of my clients about this very thing. They’re a conservative, non-profit group and they came to me about posting a video on You Tube. I told them I thought it was a great idea and it would be a positive way to get their message before a younger public. Then they asked if people would be able to comment on the video. When I told them yes they had serious concerns. As it turned out they were much more interested in delivering their message to the public than in receiving feedback from the public. They ended up posting their video but on their corporate website where they felt they could better control it and where people couldn’t talk about them.

I’ve not yet given up on helping this client enter into the conversation where appropriate. What a shame that they can’t let go and allow people to experience their brand at an interactive level. The public is ready to engage but the organization is unwilling to provide the platform for them to speak. In essence, the organization is unwilling to listen to what is being said about their brand. In our Web 2.0 society there may be no greater offense.